Angry shouts of the demonstrators
reverberated inside the US embassy walls while the terrified civilians and embassy
officials huddled inside. The thunderous
clamor to bring back the Americans’ harbored fugitive is nonstop. Finally, the irate crowd pushes through the
gates, rushing inside the embassy grounds, clambering up the walls and striking
at the door.
These are the unnerving opening
scenes of Argo. The same scenes Ben Affleck wants you to see and feel, the same
ones people inside the US Embassy of Iran must have felt like on that day in
1979. Enough to make you want to shout “Get
out now!” inside the darkened cinema but you can’t. Then finally like someone
reads your thought, some of them gets outside through a secret door and hurry to
the streets to an unknown fate. And their
ordeal from Iran to their daring escape is what Argo is all about.
I have watched the first two
films of Ben Affleck, Gone Baby Gone and The Town. Both films were good, disturbing, making you ponder.
Like Argo did. Though, I didn’t appreciate his cliché of an opening, Affleck’s
character waking up in a messy motel room because it reminded me of numerous
tortured hero Bruce Willis characters woke up to, I got past it as Argo progressed. There was more
to the film than a brooding CIA man.
There was the hilarious script
concocted just for this escape plan peppered with the presence of a
sharp-tongued producer who made the movie believable plus the calm demeanor of
the white-haired Canadian ambassador played by Victor Garber who is not CIA in
this film. Yes, he is no Jack Bristow here J Then we also have the grim-faced men of the CIA and
the State Department who you’re tempted to tell off and of course, the
realistic portrayal of the talented Middle Eastern actors who I swear made me
believe I was watching true scenes in Iran.
The location, the costumes in the
movie were commendable. The attention to detail to recreate the 70s and the
disturbing scenes on the streets was noteworthy. The backstory of the Shah of
Iran at the beginning of the film was also placed well so you know why the
Iranians are so damn mad and banging at the gates. The old news clips with US
TV anchors in their younger years also brought authenticity in the film making
you feel like you were really living in the 70s. Moreover, the grandness of
that building in Turkey where Affleck’s character met another intelligence man
was also memorable. What a landmark.
Overall, Argo was about the “best
bad idea” the CIA had that time, a proof that sometimes what is the most
bizarre and outrageous idea can be the most effective. Thinking out of the box
in this case helped a lot. Rounding up
this ludicrous plan is the cooperation of Hollywood with the CIA and the
generosity of the Canadians, all factors that helped save the life of the embassy
people. Moreover, the guts of Mendez, Affleck’s character has also been
critical, making the escape possible. His bravery was steadfast and astounding
given the dangerous circumstance they were in.
This film has indeed cemented
Affleck’s shift to directing. Given Argo’s box-office and critical success, I’m
sure we will see more of his films. I’m just amazed how he can direct a film
like he’s been at it for ages, his films remind me of those made by Clint Eastwood,
crafted with a subtle edge and seared with throbbing dilemmas. And in Argo, he
combined it with a riveting tempo, taking you to a heart-thumping ride, pulling
your insides in a knot then, and then finally letting you sigh in relief after
his characters made it through. Whew! J
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento